Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909493›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2022

Effect of Early Radial Shock Wave Treatment on Spasticity in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Stefano Brunelli, Noemi Gentileschi, Barbara Spanò, Luca Pratesi, Alessandra Calvani, Roberta Mucci, Calogero Foti

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano BrunelliSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-1564
Noemi GentileschiSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Barbara SpanòSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5291-0984
Luca PratesiSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-2901
Alessandra CalvaniSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-0310
Roberta MucciSanta Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-6600
Calogero FotiPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-348X
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spasticity is a complication that can start immediately after stroke. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) is a physical therapy tool used to manage chronic spasticity. However, the effect of rESWT's early use to treat spasticity after stroke is still not clearly investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rESWT in improving poststroke spasticity of the upper limb in patients with a recent onset of spasticity compared to conventional physiotherapy alone. Methods: 40 stroke patients were randomly assigned to experimental (EG) or control group (CG). Both groups underwent two daily sessions of conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) 5 days per week; the EG underwent one rESWT session a week for 4 weeks. The modified Ashworth scale (MAS) tested at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist was used as outcome measure. MAS was evaluated at baseline, after 2 and 4 rESWT session, and one month after the last session (follow-up). Results: No significant differences between groups were found at baseline in terms of age, days from onset of spasticity after stroke, and MAS at each body segment. The sample lost eight drop-out patients. Except for the shoulder MAS values, the EG showed statistically significant lower MAS values already after the second rESWT session compared to CG. This significant difference was maintained until the follow-up. The CG showed a significant increase of wrist spasticity after the second evaluation, while the EG maintained constant MAS values throughout the observational period. The elbow spasticity was significantly higher in the CG at the follow-up evaluation. Conclusion: The rESWT combined with CRT seems to be effective in avoiding the increasing progression of spasticity after stroke.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansMuscle SpasticityPilot ProjectsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35909493
PMCPMC9328978
OpenAlexW4286009773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.