ArticleBioMed research international2022
Risk Factor Analysis of Hepatic Encephalopathy and the Establishment of Diagnostic Model.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS: Current status and prospects in predictive assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Microbiota-gut-liver-brain axis and hepatic encephalopathy.Microbiome research reports · 2024Review
- Retracted: Risk Factor Analysis of Hepatic Encephalopathy and the Establishment of Diagnostic Model.BioMed research international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify laboratory diagnostic indicators of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), the present study established a HE diagnostic model to explore the diagnostic value of serum homocysteine, lactic acid, procalcitonin, and bile acid levels in HE identification. 371 patients with liver cirrhosis were selected as research objects, who were admitted to the Department of Hepatic Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest Minzu University from August 2019 to August 2020. The Spearman correlation results indicated that between lactic acid, procalcitonin, bile acid, serum homocysteine, and HE, the coefficients were -0.15, 0.41, 0.29, and -0.19, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis methods were adopted for inpatient analysis to identify the influencing factors of HE occurrence, and the diagnosis of the HE identification model was subsequently constructed. The univariate logistic regression showed that risk of developing HE increased as bile acid level (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.