Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909248›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2022

Immediate breast reconstruction uptake in older women with primary breast cancer: systematic review.

Rachel Xue Ning Lee, Maria Joao Cardoso, Kwok Leung Cheung, Ruth M Parks

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Development of a patient decision aid (PDA)for patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery: towards shared decision-making.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Xue Ning LeeNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-2786
Maria Joao CardosoNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kwok Leung CheungNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ruth M ParksNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-7431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (PMIBR) may improve the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, of whom older women (aged 65 years or more) are a growing proportion. This study aimed to assess PMIBR in older women with regard to underlying impediments (if any).

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched by two independent researchers up to June 2022. Eligible studies compared PMIBR rates between younger and older women with invasive primary breast cancer.

resultsA total of 10 studies (2012-2020) including 466 134 women were appraised, of whom two-thirds (313 298) were younger and one-third (152 836) older. Only 10.0 per cent of older women underwent PMIBR in contrast to 45.0 per cent of younger women. Two studies explored factors affecting uptake of PMIBR in older women; surgeon-associated (usual practice), patient-associated (socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and co-morbidities), and system-associated (insurance status and hospital location) factors were identified.

conclusionUptake of PMIBR in older women is low with definable (and some correctable) barriers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMastectomyQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID35909248
PMCPMC10364779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.