Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908796›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.

Ondrej Blaha, Denise Esserman, Fan Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantifying the Impact of Co-Housing on Murine Aging Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ondrej BlahaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Denise EssermanDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-9618
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Fall Injury Prevention Strategy-SupplementU01AG048270 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BHASIN, SHALENDER, GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2014 to 2019
$34.8M
TUFTS--FIELDINGP30AG031679 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEWIS LIPSITZ · 2008 to 2026
$23.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30 AG031679NIA NIH HHS U01 AG048270NIH HHS 5U01AG048270Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2020C3-21072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary focus of current methods for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) has been for continuous, binary, and count outcomes, with relatively less attention given to right-censored, time-to-event outcomes. In this article, we detail considerations for sample size requirement and statistical inference in CRTs with time-to-event outcomes when the intervention effect parameter is specified through the additive hazards mixed model (AHMM), which includes a frailty term to explicitly account for the dependency between the failure times. First, we discuss improved inference for the treatment effect parameter via bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators and randomization-based test under AHMM, addressing potential small-sample biases in CRTs. Next, we derive a new sample size formula for AHMM analysis of CRTs accommodating both equal and unequal cluster sizes. When the cluster sizes vary, our sample size formula depends on the mean and coefficient of variation of cluster sizes, based on which we articulate the impact of cluster size variation in CRTs with time-to-event outcomes. Furthermore, we obtain the insight that the classical variance inflation factor for CRTs with a non-censored outcome can in fact apply to CRTs with a time-to-event outcome, providing that an appropriate definition of the intraclass correlation coefficient is considered under AHMM. Simulation studies are carried out to illustrate key design and analysis considerations in CRTs with a small to moderate number of clusters. The proposed sample size procedure and analytical methods are further illustrated using the context of the STrategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders CRT.

Indexed as

Research DesignBiasCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample Sizeadditive mixed-effects modelbias-corrected sandwich variancecorrelated time-to-event outcomespower analysissample size calculationunequal cluster sizes

Identifiers

PMID35908796
PMCPMC9588628
OpenAlexW4289101648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.