Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908569›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2022

Baricitinib in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial and updated meta-analysis.

RECOVERY Collaborative Group

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisAdaptive Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 190 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
32.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04381936 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2020 to 2038Enrolled70,000ConditionsPneumoniaArmsLopinavir-Ritonavir, Corticosteroid, Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Convalescent plasma
NCT06439615 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Treatment Effect of Baricitinib for the Secondary Pulmonary Complications Following Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorTang-Du HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsSpontaneous Subarachnoid HemorrhageArmsBaricitinib 4 MG, Standard treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and baricitinib on mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 treated with corticosteroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The cost-effectiveness of using vilobelimab with immunomodulators to treat severely ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: A subgroup analysis of the PANAMO study.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Virologic Response and Safety of Ibuzatrelvir, A Novel SARS-CoV-2 Antiviral, in Adults With COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

RECOVERY Collaborative Group
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation CS/18/2/33719British Heart Foundation SP/12/2/29422Medical Research Council G1002605Medical Research Council G108/613Medical Research Council MC_PC_19056Medical Research Council MC_PC_20062Medical Research Council MC_PC_21051Medical Research Council MC_U137686860Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/14Medical Research Council MC_UU_00017/3Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome Trust 211153/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the use of baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1-2 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.

methodsThis randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing multiple possible treatments in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone (usual care group) or usual care plus baricitinib 4 mg once daily by mouth for 10 days or until discharge if sooner (baricitinib group). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A meta-analysis was done, which included the results from the RECOVERY trial and all previous randomised controlled trials of baricitinib or other JAK inhibitor in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The RECOVERY trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04381936) and is ongoing.

findingsBetween Feb 2 and Dec 29, 2021, from 10 852 enrolled, 8156 patients were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus baricitinib versus usual care alone. At randomisation, 95% of patients were receiving corticosteroids and 23% were receiving tocilizumab (with planned use within the next 24 h recorded for a further 9%). Overall, 514 (12%) of 4148 patients allocated to baricitinib versus 546 (14%) of 4008 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (age-adjusted rate ratio 0·87; 95% CI 0·77-0·99; p=0·028). This 13% proportional reduction in mortality was somewhat smaller than that seen in a meta-analysis of eight previous trials of a JAK inhibitor (involving 3732 patients and 425 deaths), in which allocation to a JAK inhibitor was associated with a 43% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0·57; 95% CI 0·45-0·72). Including the results from RECOVERY in an updated meta-analysis of all nine completed trials (involving 11 888 randomly assigned patients and 1485 deaths) allocation to baricitinib or another JAK inhibitor was associated with a 20% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0·80; 95% CI 0·72-0·89; p<0·0001). In RECOVERY, there was no significant excess in death or infection due to non-COVID-19 causes and no significant excess of thrombosis, or other safety outcomes.

interpretationIn patients hospitalised with COVID-19, baricitinib significantly reduced the risk of death but the size of benefit was somewhat smaller than that suggested by previous trials. The total randomised evidence to date suggests that JAK inhibitors (chiefly baricitinib) reduce mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 by about one-fifth.

fundingUK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentJanus Kinase InhibitorsAzetidinesHospitalsHumansPurinesPyrazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2SulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeAzetidinesbaricitinibJanus Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID35908569
PMCPMC9333998
OpenAlexW4288459457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.