ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2022
Simultaneous inference of parental admixture proportions and admixture times from unphased local ancestry calls.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase-free local ancestry inference mitigates the impact of switch errors on phase-based methods.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.Genetics · 2025Article
- Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A general approach for inferring the ancestry of recent ancestors of an admixed individual.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Global and Local Ancestry and its Importance: A Review.Current genomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population genetic analyses of local ancestry tracts routinely assume that the ancestral admixture process is identical for both parents of an individual, an assumption that may be invalid when considering recent admixture. Here, we present Parental Admixture Proportion Inference (PAPI), a Bayesian tool for inferring the admixture proportions and admixture times for each parent of a single admixed individual. PAPI analyzes unphased local ancestry tracts and has two components: a binomial model that leverages genome-wide ancestry fractions to infer parental admixture proportions and a hidden Markov model (HMM) that infers admixture times from tract lengths. Crucially, the HMM accounts for unobserved within-ancestry recombination by approximating the pedigree crossover dynamics, enabling inference of parental admixture times. In simulations, we find that PAPI's admixture proportion estimates deviate from the truth by 0.047 on average, outperforming ANCESTOR and PedMix by 46.0% and 57.6%, respectively. Moreover, PAPI's admixture time estimates were strongly correlated with the truth (R=0.76) but have an average downward bias of 1.01 generations that is partly attributable to inaccuracies in local ancestry inference. As an illustration of its utility, we ran PAPI on African American genotypes from the PAGE study (N = 5,786) and found strong evidence of assortative mating by ancestry proportion: couples' ancestry proportions are highly correlated (R = 0.87) and are closer to each other than expected under random mating (p < 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.