Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908245›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2022

Decision-making in stereotactic epilepsy surgery.

Kai J Miller, Anthony L Fine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward Unified Biomarkers for Focal Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kai J MillerNeurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-6422
Anthony L FineNeurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5256-8368

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
An Ecosystem of Technology and Protocols for Adaptive Neuromodulation Research in HumansU01NS128612 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Peter Brunner, Kai Miller · 2022 to 2026
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS128612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery can cure or significantly improve both the frequency and the intensity of seizures in patients with medication-refractory epilepsy. The set of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions involved in the path from initial consultation to definitive surgery is complex and includes a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and neuropsychologists, supported by a very large epilepsy-dedicated clinical architecture. In recent years, new practices and technologies have emerged that dramatically expand the scope of interventions performed. Stereoelectroencephalography has become widely adopted for seizure localization; stereotactic laser ablation has enabled more focal, less invasive, and less destructive interventions; and new brain stimulation devices have unlocked treatment of eloquent foci and multifocal onset etiologies. This article articulates and illustrates the full framework for how epilepsy patients are considered for surgical intervention, with particular attention given to stereotactic approaches.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyElectroencephalographyHumansSeizuresStereotaxic TechniquesTreatment Outcomeepilepsyneurosurgerystereotaxy

Identifiers

PMID35908245
PMCPMC9669234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.