Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908217›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2022

Practices and predictors of menstrual hygiene management material use among adolescent and young women in rural Pakistan: A cross-sectional assessment.

Yaqub Wasan, Jo-Anna B Baxter, Arjumand Rizvi, Fariha Shaheen, Qamaruddin Junejo, Mansoor A Abro, Amjad Hussain, Imran Ahmed, Sajid B Soofi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Menstrual Hygiene among Girls in Ghizer, Gilgit, Pakistan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yaqub WasanCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jo-Anna B BaxterCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arjumand RizviCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fariha ShaheenCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Qamaruddin JunejoCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mansoor A AbroCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amjad HussainCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Imran AhmedCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sajid B SoofiCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), women often use inappropriate materials to manage menstruation, which can threaten their health. Improper practices can also have critical downstream consequences beyond physiologic health, including restricting adolescent girls' access to academic pursuits. Methods: We used cross-sectional data collected through a structured questionnaire from the menstruating adolescents and young women 15-23 years of age living in rural Pakistan (n = 25 305). We aimed to describe menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices and generate a predictive model of the socioeconomic and demographic factors related to the use of MHM materials. Beliefs and barriers around MHM were also summarized. The outcome variable included: those who practiced appropriate and inappropriate MHM practices. Logistic regression was used to generate the predictive model, with results presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Inappropriate MHM practices were reported by 75% (n = 19 006) of participants. The majority 61.9% (n = 15 667) reported using old cloths, 12.6% (n = 3191) used nothing, and 0.5% (n = 136) used old cloth with a sanitary pad. One-fourth of participants reported appropriate MHM material use, including 16.2% (n = 4087) sanitary pads, 8.6% (n = 2167) new cloth, and a few reported using sanitary pads with new cloth 0.2% (n = 45). Inappropriate MHM practices were more common in lowest wealth quintile (OR = 4.41; 95% CI = 2.77-7.01, P < 0.0001), followed by those with no education (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 3.36-4.52, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The study indicates the need for multi-sectoral efforts to introduce MHM-specific and MHM-sensitive interventions to improve MHM practices, ranging from the availability of low-cost MHM materials to the inclusion of MHM education in school curriculums and within the community platforms.

Indexed as

HygieneMenstruationAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPakistan

Identifiers

PMID35908217
PMCPMC9339234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.