Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908174›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022

The incidence of cervical cancer in women with postcoital bleeding and abnormal appearance of the cervix referred through the 2-week wait pathway in the United Kingdom: A retrospective cohort study.

Brittany Jasper, Emma Thorley, Filipe Correia Martins, Krishnayan Haldar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brittany JasperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North West Anglia Healthcare NHS Trust, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-3105
Emma ThorleySchool of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-2547
Filipe Correia MartinsDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Krishnayan HaldarDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGriffith University · AUImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the incidence of cervical cancer in women referred through the 2-week-wait pathway for postcoital bleeding and abnormal appearance of the cervix.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted of women with postcoital bleeding, or abnormal appearance of the cervix referred to colposcopy clinics through the 2-week-wait pathway for suspected cervical cancer at Cambridge University Hospitals in the United Kingdom over 5 years. Women were identified from a departmental database. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Categorical data was analyzed with chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests and predictive values were calculated.

resultsOf the 604 women referred, 1.16% were diagnosed with cervical cancer. None of the women who were up-to-date with cervical screening were diagnosed with cervical cancer, while 6.25% of women out-of-date with cervical screening or outside the screening age group were diagnosed with cervical cancer (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value for diagnosing cervical cancer was 1.70% for postcoital bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-3.7) and 0.31% for abnormal appearance of the cervix (95% CI 0.0008-1.7).

conclusionsThe incidence of cervical cancer in women referred through the 2-week-wait pathway for postcoital bleeding and abnormal appearance of the cervix is low. These referrals have considerable implications for both patients and clinicians, and have a low predictive value for diagnosing cervical cancer. In light of emerging evidence and changing practices, referral guidelines should be reviewed based on up-to-date data and current practices.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriColposcopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHemorrhageHumansIncidencePregnancyReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomcervical intraepithelial neoplasiacolposcopyincidencereferral and consultationuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35908174
PMCPMC9796743
OpenAlexW4288914065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.