Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908145›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023

Assessing medical students' perception and educational experience during COVID-19 pandemic.

Ernest Z Low, Niall J O'Sullivan, Vidushi Sharma, Isabella Sebastian, Roisin Meagher, Dalal Alomairi, Ebraheem H Alhouti, Claire L Donohoe, Michael E Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virtual reality exoskeleton for post-partum uterine tamponade balloon training: Impact on learning and operator satisfaction.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ernest Z LowTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. lowe@tcd.ie.
Niall J O'SullivanTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Vidushi SharmaTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Isabella SebastianTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Roisin MeagherTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Dalal AlomairiTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ebraheem H AlhoutiTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire L DonohoeTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael E KellyTrinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the traditional delivery of medical education. Medical education programmes have had to cope with limitations on face-to-face learning, and accelerate the adoption of digital learning. In addition, the pandemic has potential serious implications on the psychological well-being of medical students. We aim to assess the changes in perceptions and experiences of medical students as a consequence of this pandemic.

methodsCross-sectional survey of medical students at Trinity College Dublin (TCD) between March and April 2022 was performed. The survey explored student satisfaction with the current education program, teaching delivery and the impact of COVID-19 on education and student well-being.

results175 medical students participated in the survey. Overall, the majority of students were happy/neutral with their medical education. 93 (53.1%) felt tutorials and problem-based learning (PBL) to be the most effective method of teaching, followed by laboratory and clinical placements in 78 participants (44.6%) and hybrid-learning in 85 participants (48.6%). There was a mixed reaction to the changes in the delivery of education brought about by the pandemic. 67 participants (40.6%) felt happy with the changes, another 64 participants (38.8%) felt neutral, whilst only 34 participants (20.6%) were unhappy. However, most participants felt the pandemic negatively impacted their mental health, with 96 participants (55.8%) reporting negative responses. 58% of participants (n = 102/175) reported utilising the student support services at university campus and 49% (n = 50) were satisfied with their services.

conclusionDigital content and delivery confer the benefit of greater flexibility in learning, the ability to learn at one's own pace and in a preferred environment, however lacks the advantage of bedside teaching and hands-on training. Our findings reinforce the potential advantages of online learning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPerceptionCOVID-19 pandemicDigital educationFormative assessmentHybrid learningMedical educationMental healthSummative assessment

Identifiers

PMID35908145
PMCPMC9362516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.