Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908068›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Comparing western (Megascops kennicottii) and whiskered (M. trichopsis) screech-owl microbiomes in southern Arizona using a novel 16S rRNA sequencing method.

Andrew W Bartlow, S Kane Moser, Jeremy E Ellis, Charles D Hathcock, Jeanne M Fair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew W BartlowBiosecurity and Public Health Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS M888, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. abartlow@lanl.gov.
S Kane MoserBiosecurity and Public Health Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS M888, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Jeremy E EllisFry Laboratories, LLC, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, USA.
Charles D HathcockEnvironmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Jeanne M FairBiosecurity and Public Health Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS M888, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Los Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Laboratory Directed Research and Development 3B100A-XX9E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes are essential to a host's physiology and health. Despite the overall importance of microbiomes to animal health, they remain understudied in wildlife. Microbiomes function as physical barriers to invading pathogens, and changes in the diversity or composition of microbes within a host may disrupt this barrier. In order to use microbiomes in wildlife ecology, knowledge of the natural variation within and among species is essential. We compare the diversity and composition of two avian species that share the same habitat and niche in our study area, the western screech-owl (Megascops kennicottii) and the whiskered screech-owl (M. trichopsis). We used a targeted 16S sequencing method to improve the taxonomic resolution of microbiomes. We found similar measures of alpha diversity between species and sample types (cloacal samples vs. fecal samples). However, there were significant differences in bacterial species richness among nestlings from different nest boxes, and the composition differed between the two bird species and among nestlings from different nest boxes. Western screech-owls had more variation in alpha diversity and composition and had fewer bacterial species in their core microbiome than whiskered screech-owls. Siblings are likely to yield similar findings for microbiomes; thus, sampling nestlings from different nests may be most informative for monitoring population-level changes.

Indexed as

Gut microbiotaMicrobial communitiesNestlingsNext generation sequencingWildlife

Identifiers

PMID35908068
PMCPMC9338619
OpenAlexW4288685820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.