Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35908067›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Feasibility and acceptability of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of bladder storage symptoms among people with multiple sclerosis.

Hawra B Al Dandan, Rose Galvin, Katie Robinson, Doreen McClurg, Susan Coote

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04528784 (Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Bladder Storage Symptoms in People With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04528784 nacompletednot on this map

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Bladder Storage Symptoms in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol of a Single-arm Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LimerickRan2020 to 2021Enrolled23ConditionsBladder Dysfunction, Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction, Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsTranscutaneous tibial nerve stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hawra B Al DandanSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Hawra.aldandan@ul.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-7323
Rose GalvinSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Katie RobinsonSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Doreen McClurgNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Susan CooteSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
University of Limerick · IEGlasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is an abnormality in the presence of underlying neurologic disease. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that storage phase symptoms are the predominant symptoms among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a non-invasive treatment for bladder storage symptoms; however, the potential efficacy of stimulation among PwMS is based on a small number of studies with the absence of high-quality evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of TTNS in PwMS using an affordable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit.

methodsA total of 23 participants with MS enrolled in the study. The primary outcomes included recruitment/retention rate, completion of the outcomes and the intervention, adherence to the protocol, adverse events, and acceptability of the intervention. The primary outcomes were assessed using diaries and a satisfaction questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included changes in urinary symptoms and quality of life assessed using a set of validated outcome measures including a 3-day bladder diary, PPIUS, ICIQ-OAB, and KHQ at baseline and post-intervention.

resultsTwenty participants completed the study. Three participants (13.04%) withdrew. All 20 participants completed the 6-week intervention and all the outcome measures (100%), with no reported adverse events. Participants were satisfied and found the unit acceptable. Three-day bladder diary showed changes in urinary frequency from a daily median of 10 times to 8 times and daily median urgency changed from 6 times at baseline to 2 times post-intervention. PPIUS showed changes in daily median sever urgency from 3 points (IQR=4) to 1 point (IQR=1) post-intervention. ICIQ-OAB total scores changed from 8 points (IQR=2.25) to 4 points (IQR=2.5) post-intervention. Median and mean scores of KHQ showed a clinical meaningful change of QoL in part-two and part-three of the questionnaire.

conclusionsTTNS is feasible, safe, and acceptable for PwMS. Changes of urinary symptoms scores and QoL post-intervention suggested improvements. Future implications need to consider the treatment protocol including frequency of treatment sessions, duration of treatment, and the electrical stimulation parameters as well as the outcome measures followed in the current study for the implementation of the future pilot RCT.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04528784 . Registered on 27 August 2020. https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts=1&cx=-jg9qo4 .

Indexed as

Electrical nerve stimulationNeurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctionNeuromodulationQuality of life questionnaireTibial nerve

Identifiers

PMID35908067
PMCPMC9338631
OpenAlexW4288748942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.