ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022
Over-Prescription of the Imidazoline Receptor Agonists: Evidence for Restriction of the Therapeutic Indication.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor antihypertensive drug classes (but not Imidazoline Receptor Agonists) have been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In 2017, Latvia and Lithuania had the highest cardiovascular mortality among the Eastern, Central, Northern, and Western Member States of the European Union (EU). Cardiovascular mortality in Estonia is much lower than in Lithuania and Latvia.
objectiveTo evaluate the consumption of Imidazoline Receptor Agonists in the Baltic States and its potential implications. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included data on the sales of Imidazoline Receptor Agonists in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia; the marketing authorization databases of the competent authorities; the guidelines on the treatment of hypertension, and the reimbursement conditions.
resultsThe study showed a very high consumption of the Imidazoline Receptor Agonists in Lithuania and Latvia. From 2016 to 2019, the average consumption of Imidazoline Receptor Agonists in Lithuania was 15.5 times higher than in Estonia; in Latvia, it was 8.9 times higher than in Estonia. The guidelines recommend the use of the Imidazoline Receptors Agonists as one of the last options in hypertension therapy, but the marketing authorizations do not restrict their line of therapy.
conclusionsConsumption of IRAs in Lithuania and Latvia is very high. The authorized use of the IRAs in the EU Member States is not in line with the guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension and therefore patients might be deprived of therapies that reduce the cardiovascular risk. The drug regulatory authorities of the EU should review the data on the safety and efficacy of the IRAs and restrict their therapeutic indications if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.