ArticleEye (London, England)2023
The microbiological landscape and epidemiology of ocular infections in a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India: an electronic medical record driven analytics report.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training partnerships between United States and Indian eye institutions.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the epidemiology and landscape of ocular infections in patients undergoing microbiological investigations across a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India.
methodsThis cross-sectional hospital-based study included 15,822 patients in whom microbiology samples were analysed between September 2013 and December 2021. Ocular tissue of patients in whom a microbiology sample was processed in at least one eye were included. The data were collected using an indigenously developed electronic medical record system.
resultsAmong the 15,822 patients, bacteria (51.06%) was the most common aetiology followed by fungus (38.27%). The majority of the patients were male (68.10%) and adults (90.01%). The most common age group was during the sixth decade of life with 2,914 (18.42%) patients. The patients were more commonly from the lower socio-economic status (51.61%) and from the rural geography (46.82%). Majority of the specimens sent for microbiological analysis were corneal scrapings (68.61%) followed by vitreous (8.77%). The most common bacteria isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (14.45%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.53%) and among the fungus were Fusarium (30.53%) and Aspergillus species (29.86%). Acanthamoeba (1.26%) and Microsporidia (0.38%) accounted for a minority of the infections in the samples. Fungus (53.10%; p ≤ 0.00001) and virus (51.08%; p = 0.000673) aetiology was found to be significantly higher in patients presenting from the rural geography.
conclusionThe most common aetiology of infection in ocular disease is bacterial but fungal infections also accounted for a significant proportion. The majority of the patients with ocular infections presented from the rural geography and from lower socio-economic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.