Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35907204›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology2022

Review on the ecotoxicological impacts of plastic pollution on the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia.

Afshin Samadi, Youngsam Kim, Sang-Ah Lee, Young Jun Kim, Maranda Esterhuizen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecotoxicological evaluation of surface waters in Northern Namibia.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polystyrene nanoplastics differentially influence the outcome of infection by two microparasites of the hostPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Afshin SamadiEnvironmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbrucken, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-2273
Youngsam KimEnvironmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbrucken, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-9975
Sang-Ah LeeEnvironmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbrucken, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-6722
Young Jun KimEnvironmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbrucken, Germany.
Maranda EsterhuizenEnvironmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbrucken, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-3941
KIST Europe · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Korean Institutes of Science and Technology (KIST) Europe's National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) CAP-17-01-KIST EuropeNanomaterial Technology Development Program NRF-2017M3A7B6052455South Korean Ministry of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environmental impacts of plastic pollution have recently attracted universal attention, especially in the aquatic environment. However, research has mostly been focused on marine ecosystems, even though freshwater ecosystems are equally if not more polluted by plastics. In addition, the mechanism and extent to which plastic pollution affects aquatic biota and the rates of transfer to organisms through food webs eventually reaching humans are poorly understood, especially considering leaching hazardous chemicals. Several studies have demonstrated extreme toxicity in freshwater organisms such Daphnia. When such keystone species are affected by ambient pollution, entire food webs are destabilized and biodiversity is threatened. The unremitting increase in plastic contaminants in freshwater environments would cause impairments in ecosystem functions and structure, leading to various kinds of negative ecological consequences. As various studies have reported the effects on daphnids, a consolidation of this literature is critical to discuss the limitations and knowledge gaps and to evaluate the risk posed to the aquatic environment. This review was undertaken due to the evident need to evaluate this threat. The aims were to provide a meaningful overview of the literature relevant to the potential impact of plastic pollution and associated contaminants on freshwater daphnids as primary consumers. A critical evaluation of research gaps and perspectives is conducted to provide a comprehensive risk assessment of microplastic as a hazard to aquatic environments. We outlined the challenges and limitations to microplastic research in hampering better-focused investigations that could support the development of new plastic materials and/or establishment of new regulations.

Indexed as

PlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsDaphniaEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterHazardous SubstancesHumansInvertebratesMicroplasticsHazardous SubstancesMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, Chemicalecosystemfreshwater Daphniamicroplasticsnanoplasticspollution

Identifiers

PMID35907204
PMCPMC9796382
OpenAlexW4288855679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.