Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35907105›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Relations between recurrence risk perceptions and fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors.

J W Ankersmid, F K Lansink Rotgerink, L J A Strobbe, C F van Uden-Kraan, S Siesling, C H C Drossaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mitigating fear of cancer recurrence.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J W AnkersmidDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. j.w.ankersmid@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-8147
F K Lansink RotgerinkSanteon, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L J A StrobbeDepartment of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C F van Uden-KraanSanteon, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S SieslingDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
C H C DrossaertDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 516007001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to: (1) determine the accuracy of Dutch breast cancer survivors' estimations of the locoregional recurrence risk (LRR); (2) examine which variables influence (the accuracy of) risk estimations, and risk appraisals; and (3) investigate the influence of the objective LRR risk (estimated using the INFLUENCE-nomogram), risk estimations and risk appraisals on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Findings of this study will inform clinicians on risk communication and can improve communication about FCR.

methodsIn a cross-sectional survey among 258 breast cancer survivors, women's recurrence risk estimations (in odds) and risk appraisals (in high/low), FCR, demographics and illness perceptions, about one year after surgery were measured and compared to the objective risk for LRRs estimated using the INFLUENCE-nomogram.

resultsHalf of the women (54%) accurately estimated their LRR risk, 34% underestimated and 13% overestimated their risk. Risk estimations and risk appraisals were only moderately positively correlated (r = 0.58). Higher risk appraisals were associated with radiotherapy (r = 0.18) and having weaker cure beliefs (r = - 0.19). Younger age was associated with overestimation of risk (r = - 0.23). Recurrence risk estimations and risk appraisals were associated with more FCR (r = 0.29, r = 0.39). In regression, only risk appraisal contributed significantly to FCR.

conclusionAlthough women were fairly accurate in recurrence risk estimations, it remains difficult to predict over- or underestimation. Recurrence risk estimations and risk appraisal are two different concepts which are both associated with FCR and should therefore be addressed in patient-provider communication.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBreast cancerFear of cancer recurrenceRecurrencesRisk informationSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35907105
PMCPMC9362565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.