ArticleEJNMMI physics2022
Towards personalised dosimetry in patients with liver malignancy treated with
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theranostic Radioembolization: Radiation Dosimetry-Guided Treatment Planning and Delivery.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Framework to calculateMedical physics · 2025Article
- A proof-of-concept study of personalized dosimetry for targeted radioligand therapy using pre-treatment diagnostic dynamic PET/CT and Monte Carlo simulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prediction of response is one of the major challenges in radiation-based therapies. Although the selection of accurate linear-quadratic model parameters is essential for the estimation of radiation response and treatment outcome, there is a limited knowledge about these radiobiological parameters for liver tumours using radionuclide treatments.
methodsThe "clinical radiobiological" parameters ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) for twenty-five patients were derived using the generalised linear-quadratic model, the diagnostic ([
resultsIt was estimated that the values for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] parameters range in ≈ 0.001-1 Gy
conclusionsTumours with shorter [Formula: see text] have shown a shorter [Formula: see text] and thus poorer TCP and [Formula: see text]. Therefore, these results suggest for such tumours the [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.