ArticleTropical animal health and production2022
Spatial-temporal trends and economic losses associated with bovine abortifacients in central Argentina.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic losses due to brucellosis and neosporosis abortions in Argentine beef herds.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Risk factors for early and mid-to-late pregnancy loss and their effects on reproductive performance in dairy cows.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Article
- Systemic humoral immune responses and metabolic parameters in chronicallyFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies concentrations in commercial bovine reproductive vaccines.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Article
- Cytokine Expression and Haptoglobin Levels in Bovine Fetuses Spontaneously Aborted by Intracellular Infectious Agents and by Probable Infectious Etiology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Estimation of direct economic and productive losses due to abortions caused byFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Bovine campylobacteriosis in heifer: pathogenesis study and insights in the conventional and molecular diagnosis in an experimental bovine model and field cases.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Infectious sporadic bovine abortions: retrospective analysis.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Characterisation of reproductive tract microbiome and immune biomarkers for bovine genital campylobacteriosis in vaccinated and unvaccinated heifers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Leptospiral adhesins: from identification to future perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Reproduction and Productivity in Dairy Cattle after Abortions Both Related and Unrelated toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Global, regional, and country-level cost of leptospirosis due to loss of productivity in humans.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Editorial: Diseases affecting reproduction and the neonatal period in ruminants, Volume II.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aims of this work are, firstly, to provide the geolocalization of cases of bovine abortion with definitive diagnosis and, secondly, to estimate the economic losses due to the most frequent abortifacients diagnosed agents in cattle in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. The total beef and dairy cattle population at risk of abortion is 8,358,186 and 538,076, respectively. In beef cattle, the overall risk of abortion was estimated at 4.5% for all pregnancies, where 27.9% are due to Campylobacter fetus, Neospora caninum, Leptospira spp., Brucella abortus, and bovine viral diarrhea virus with economic losses of US$ 440 per abortion, being the annual loss to the beef industry of US$ 50,144,101. In dairy cattle, there was an 8.0% risk of suffering abortion, 26.1% produced by the same abortigenic agents. The economic losses were estimated at US$ 1,415 per abortion, which equals a total loss of US$ 17,298,498 for the dairy industry in the region. The results of this study show that infectious causes are highly prevalent in Buenos Aires province, and they caused severe economic impacts in the dairy and beef industries. Furthermore, changes in temporal trends of infectious abortion occurrence were detected, probably related to the inclusion of molecular diagnostic techniques with more sensitivity or different epidemiological or husbandry conditions in the region analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.