Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35907009›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Real world data on IO-based therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Viktoria Stühler, Lisa Herrmann, Steffen Rausch, Arnulf Stenzl, Jens Bedke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Viktoria StühlerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lisa HerrmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Steffen RauschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Arnulf StenzlDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jens BedkeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. bedke@live.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmune-based (IO)-combinations are the backbone in the systemic therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Despite phase III clinical trial data, real world data are of special importance to reflect clinical practice.

methodsThis retrospective study included 201 mRCC patients receiving first-line systemic therapy from January 2006. Clinicopathological and treatment-related data were recorded. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsOver the years, IO-based therapies have increased significantly. The collective comprises 76 patients with first-line IO-based therapy (IO-IO:55, TKI-IO:21) and 125 patients with TKI-monotherapy. PFS was significantly improved with TKI-IO combinations if compared to both TKI-monotherapy (23.9 vs. 10.3 months, HR 0.48, p = 0.034) and IO-IO combination (23.9 vs. 6.1 months, HR 0.37, p = 0.012). OS for TKI-IO treated patients was longer compared to TKI-monotherapy (HR 0.37, p = 0.050) at median follow-up of 24.1 versus 29.9 months. In a subanalysis of nivolumab treated patients, starting from second-line (n = 40), PFS was 5.5 months. The addition of nivolumab either in second-or later lines improved OS compared to repeated TKI- or mTOR-therapies alone (6.13 vs. 2.61 years, HR 0.46, p = 0.003).

conclusionBoth first-line IO-based combinations and nivolumab after first-line TKI-monotherapy prolong OS in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNivolumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesNivolumabProtein Kinase InhibitorsImmune checkpoint inhibitorImmuno-oncologyRenal cell carcinomaTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID35907009
PMCPMC10314860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.