Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906926›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Comprehensive Phylogenomics of Methylobacterium Reveals Four Evolutionary Distinct Groups and Underappreciated Phyllosphere Diversity.

Jean-Baptiste Leducq, David Sneddon, Malia Santos, Domitille Condrain-Morel, Geneviève Bourret, N Cecilia Martinez-Gomez, Jessica A Lee, James A Foster, Sergey Stolyar, B Jesse Shapiro and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. EngineeredmSphere · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A novel protein for bioremediation of gadolinium waste.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Application of a Foliar Spray ContainingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jean-Baptiste LeducqDépartement de Phytologie - FSAA - IBIS - CRIV, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
David SneddonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Malia SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Domitille Condrain-MorelDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Geneviève BourretDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
N Cecilia Martinez-GomezDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, UC, Berkeley, California.
Jessica A LeeNASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California.
James A FosterDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Sergey StolyarDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
B Jesse ShapiroDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6819-8699
Steven W KembelDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jack M SullivanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-6867
Christopher J MarxDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylobacterium is a group of methylotrophic microbes associated with soil, fresh water, and particularly the phyllosphere, the aerial part of plants that has been well studied in terms of physiology but whose evolutionary history and taxonomy are unclear. Recent work has suggested that Methylobacterium is much more diverse than thought previously, questioning its status as an ecologically and phylogenetically coherent taxonomic genus. However, taxonomic and evolutionary studies of Methylobacterium have mostly been restricted to model species, often isolated from habitats other than the phyllosphere and have yet to utilize comprehensive phylogenomic methods to examine gene trees, gene content, or synteny. By analyzing 189 Methylobacterium genomes from a wide range of habitats, including the phyllosphere, we inferred a robust phylogenetic tree while explicitly accounting for the impact of horizontal gene transfer (HGT). We showed that Methylobacterium contains four evolutionarily distinct groups of bacteria (namely A, B, C, D), characterized by different genome size, GC content, gene content, and genome architecture, revealing the dynamic nature of Methylobacterium genomes. In addition to recovering 59 described species, we identified 45 candidate species, mostly phyllosphere-associated, stressing the significance of plants as a reservoir of Methylobacterium diversity. We inferred an ancient transition from a free-living lifestyle to association with plant roots in Methylobacteriaceae ancestor, followed by phyllosphere association of three of the major groups (A, B, D), whose early branching in Methylobacterium history has been heavily obscured by HGT. Together, our work lays the foundations for a thorough redefinition of Methylobacterium taxonomy, beginning with the abandonment of Methylorubrum.

Indexed as

MethylobacteriumEcosystemPhylogenyPlant LeavesPlantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Score genomegenome architecturehorizontal gene transferslineage treeMethylobacteriumMethylorubrumphyllospherespecies concept in bacteriaspecies tree

Identifiers

PMID35906926
PMCPMC9364378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.