Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906685›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2022

Shared understanding of resilient practices in the context of inpatient suicide prevention: a narrative synthesis.

Siv Hilde Berg, Kristine Rørtveit, Fredrik A Walby, Karina Aase

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siv Hilde BergCentre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway. Siv.h.berg@uis.no.
Kristine RørtveitMilieu Therapy and Mental Health Nursing Research Group, Clinics of Adult Mental Health Care, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Fredrik A WalbyNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 21, Building 12, N-0320, Oslo, Norway.
Karina AaseCentre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Helse Vest 911846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevailing patient safety strategies in suicide prevention are suicide risk assessments and retrospective reviews, with emphasis on minimising risk and preventing adverse events. Resilient healthcare focuses on how everyday clinical practice succeeds and emphasises learning from practice, not from adverse events. Yet, little is known about resilient practices for suicidal inpatients. The aim of the study is to draw upon the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals to inform the conceptual development of resilient practices in inpatient suicide prevention.

methodsA narrative synthesis was conducted of findings across patients and healthcare professionals derived from a qualitative case study based on interviews with patients and healthcare professionals in addition to a systematic literature review.

resultsThree sub-themes categorise resilient practices for healthcare professionals and for patients hospitalised with suicidal behaviour: 1) interactions capturing non-verbal cues; 2) protection through dignity and watchfulness; and 3) personalised approaches to alleviate emotional pressure. The main theme, the establishment of relationships of trust in resilient practices for patients in suicidal crisis, is the foundation of their communication and caring.

conclusionClinical practice for patients hospitalised with suicidal behaviour has characteristics of complex adaptive systems in terms of dynamic interactions, decision-making under uncertainty, tensions between goals solved through trade-offs, and adaptations to patient variability and interpersonal needs. To improve the safety of patients hospitalised with suicidal behaviour, variability in clinical practice should be embraced.

trial registrationhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012874.

Indexed as

InpatientsSuicideSuicide PreventionHumansQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesSuicidal IdeationAdaptationComplexityInpatient suicideMental healthPatient safetyResilient healthcareSafety scienceSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID35906685
PMCPMC9336074
OpenAlexW4288535110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.