Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906675›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Stakeholder engagement to inform evidence-based treatment implementation for children's mental health: a scoping review.

Noah S Triplett, Grace S Woodard, Clara Johnson, Julie K Nguyen, Rashed AlRasheed, Frank Song, Sophia Stoddard, Jules Cesar Mugisha, Kristen Sievert, Shannon Dorsey

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Scaling out a Digital-First Behavioral Health Care Model to Primary Care.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noah S TriplettDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. nst7@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-3599
Grace S WoodardDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.
Clara JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Julie K NguyenDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Rashed AlRasheedDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Frank SongDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sophia StoddardDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Jules Cesar MugishaDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Kristen SievertDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Shannon DorseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

Attending to the “whole” child in mental health care: Utilizing a partnership approach to address social risk factors alongside an evidence-based psychotherapyF31MH130041 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHNSON, CLARA · 2022 to 2024
$143k
Applying Human-Centered Design to Inform Mobile Technology-Mediated Supervision with Lay Counselors in KenyaF31MH124328 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TRIPLETT, NOAH SHAY · 2020 to 2022
$133k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH124328NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH130041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a pervasive mental health treatment gap for children across the globe. Engaging stakeholders in child mental health evidence-based treatment (EBT) implementation projects may increase the likelihood of successful EBT implementation, thereby better addressing the treatment gap. However, little is known about the extent of stakeholder engagement to inform the implementation of child mental health EBTs.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to characterize stakeholder engagement in child mental health EBT implementation projects, including what stakeholders are engaged, how they are engaged, when they are engaged, where they are engaged (i.e., location of projects), why they are engaged, and the reported impacts of stakeholder engagement. We searched seven databases: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. To be included, studies had to report on some form of stakeholder engagement that was undertaken to inform or explain the implementation of a child mental health EBT. We performed data extraction and synthesis to describe key study and stakeholder characteristics, stakeholder engagement methods and rationales, reported impacts of stakeholder engagement, and quality of reporting on stakeholder engagement.

resultsIn total, 122 manuscripts met our inclusion criteria, from which we identified a total of 103 unique child mental health EBT implementation projects. Projects spanned 22 countries, which included low-, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income countries. The largest number of projects was in the USA and conducted in public mental health settings. Most projects engaged EBT providers during the active implementation phase and with limited depth, often gathering information from stakeholders without sharing decision-making power in implementation efforts. Across projects, impacts of stakeholder engagement spanned all of Proctor and colleague's implementation outcomes.

conclusionsGiven that stakeholder engagement is often shallow and with limited shared decision-making, additional effort should be made to increase engagement to preempt challenges to EBT implementation and ensure implementation success. Such efforts may ensure the just distribution of power in EBT implementation efforts.

trial registrationAll procedures were pre-registered on the Open Science Framework prior to conducting the literature search (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GR9AP ).

Indexed as

Children’s mental healthEvidence-based treatmentStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID35906675
PMCPMC9338493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.