ArticleParasites & vectors2022
Methodological issues on evaluating agreement between two detection methods by Cohen's kappa analysis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of CLIA and ELISA Serological Assays for HSV-1 IgG With Western Blot Confirmation in a Clinical Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Transperineal ultrasound versus digital palpation: Identifying key parameters for objective pelvic floor muscle contraction assessment.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Strengthening STD Screening Programs: Comprehensive Evaluation of High-Throughput Immunoassays for HIV and Syphilis Detection.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Understanding indeterminate HIV serology through antigen-band pattern analysis of INNO-LIA and recomLine HIV confirmatory assays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Consistent performance of cytomegalovirus IgG assays across platforms contrasts with marked IgM variability, supporting IgG avidity-based infection classification in a high-prevalence population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the service quality and diagnostic performance of syphilis self-test kits purchased from E-commerce platforms in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing HIV Diagnostics: Comparative Evaluation of Multisure HIV-1/2 Rapid Confirmatory Test Against Geenius and Traditional Reference Assays Within a CDC-Aligned Diagnostic Framework.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Accre 8 emerging point of care CLIA system for vitamin B12 assessment compared with three established assays.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the mindray CL900i CLIA HIV Ag/Ab combo assay for sensitive and specific HIV screening compared to established methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Thyroid Nodule Excision Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We read with great interest the article by Hendershot et al. (Parasit Vectors 14:473, 2021). The authors compared a PCR method for detecting Plasmodium vivax's mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with the current "gold standard" circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of Plasmodium vivax during development within Anopheles arabiensis. We found that Cohen's kappa value for measuring the agreement between mt COX-I PCR and CSP ELISA was questionable. In addition, we recommend a more appropriate statistical method in this article.In short, any scientific conclusion requires support by the reasonable application of methodological and statistical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.