Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906547›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

A biomedical event extraction method based on fine-grained and attention mechanism.

Xinyu He, Ping Tai, Hongbin Lu, Xin Huang, Yonggong Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinyu HeSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China. hexinyu@lnnu.edu.cn.
Ping TaiFIL Technology Limited, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Hongbin LuInformation and Communication Engineering Postdoctoral Research Station, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xin HuangAnshan Normal University, Anshan, Liaoning, China.
Yonggong RenSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China. 444801898@qq.com.

Funding

Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Fund project 2021-BS-201National Natural Science Foundation of China 61976109National Natural Science Foundation of China 62006108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical event extraction is a fundamental task in biomedical text mining, which provides inspiration for medicine research and disease prevention. Biomedical events include simple events and complex events. Existing biomedical event extraction methods usually deal with simple events and complex events uniformly, and the performance of complex event extraction is relatively low.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a fine-grained Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory method for biomedical event extraction, which designs different argument detection models for simple and complex events respectively. In addition, multi-level attention is designed to improve the performance of complex event extraction, and sentence embeddings are integrated to obtain sentence level information which can resolve the ambiguities for some types of events. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the commonly used dataset Multi-Level Event Extraction.

conclusionsThe sentence embeddings enrich the global sentence-level information. The fine-grained argument detection model improves the performance of complex biomedical event extraction. Furthermore, the multi-level attention mechanism enhances the interactions among relevant arguments. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for biomedical event extraction.

Indexed as

Data MiningArgument detectionEvent extractionFine-grainedMulti-level attentionTrigger identification

Identifiers

PMID35906547
PMCPMC9336007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.