ArticleScientific reports2022
A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of economic importance in South Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiplex PCR-based identification of two sympatric stem borer species, Sesamia cretica and Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial genome of Bactrocera fruit flies (Tephritidae: Dacini): features, structure, and significance for diagnosis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Rapid visual detection assay for Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) using recombinase polymerase amplification and CRISPR/Cas12b.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Tool for the Identification ofInsects · 2024Article
- A simple PCR-based quick detection of the economically important oriental fruit fly,Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Utilisation of a mitochondrial intergenic region for species differentiation of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa.BMC genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species, Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis cosyra, Ceratitis rosa, Ceratitis quilicii, and Bactrocera dorsalis are of economic importance in South Africa. These agricultural pests cause extensive damage to a range of commercially produced fruit, primarily for export. These pests are of phytosanitary significance, and their presence in fruit-producing regions in South Africa has led to restrictions in export trade of fresh produce. Accurate identification of these flies, particularly at immature stages intercepted in fruit consignments originating from South Africa, is essential but remains an ongoing challenge. A rapid and accurate identification assay to differentiate these five species is needed for inspection and pest surveillance. High throughput sequencing data were generated for each of the five fruit fly species, and five sets of species-specific primers were designed for use in a multiplex PCR. Each primer set amplifies an amplicon of a different size for each species allowing for accurate identification. PCR sensitivity tests demonstrate that the limit of detection for this assay is 10 ng and 4 ng of DNA when extracted from larvae and adult specimens, respectively. The assay developed can be applied in fruit inspection and survey activities within the country and at ports of entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.