Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906437›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2023

Deep multi-task learning and random forest for series classification by pulse sequence type and orientation.

Noah Kasmanoff, Matthew D Lee, Narges Razavian, Yvonne W Lui

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noah Kasmanoff *Center for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-4642
Matthew D Lee *Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA. matthew.lee4@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-1076
Narges RazavianCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-6370
Yvonne W LuiDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-9164
New York University · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066512 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Mary Sherman Mittelman · 2020 to 2026
$28.4M
TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreasingly complex MRI studies and variable series naming conventions reveal limitations of rule-based image routing, especially in health systems with multiple scanners and sites. Accurate methods to identify series based on image content would aid post-processing and PACS viewing. Recent deep/machine learning efforts classify 5-8 basic brain MR sequences. We present an ensemble model combining a convolutional neural network and a random forest classifier to differentiate 25 brain sequences and image orientation.

methodsSeries were grouped by descriptions into 25 sequences and 4 orientations. Dataset A, obtained from our institution, was divided into training (16,828 studies; 48,512 series; 112,028 images), validation (4746 studies; 16,612 series; 26,222 images) and test sets (6348 studies; 58,705 series; 3,314,018 images). Dataset B, obtained from a separate hospital, was used for out-of-domain external validation (1252 studies; 2150 series; 234,944 images). We developed an ensemble model combining a 2D convolutional neural network with a custom multi-task learning architecture and random forest classifier trained on DICOM metadata to classify sequence and orientation by series.

resultsThe neural network, random forest, and ensemble achieved 95%, 97%, and 98% overall sequence accuracy on dataset A, and 98%, 99%, and 99% accuracy on dataset B, respectively. All models achieved > 99% orientation accuracy on both datasets.

conclusionThe ensemble model for series identification accommodates the complexity of brain MRI studies in state-of-the-art clinical practice. Expanding on previous work demonstrating proof-of-concept, our approach is more comprehensive with greater sequence diversity and orientation classification.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRandom ForestBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingDeep learningMachine learningMRISequence classification

Identifiers

PMID35906437
PMCPMC9361920
OpenAlexW4288684669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.