Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906417›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2022

Nerve transfers in the forearm: potential use in spastic conditions.

Charlotte Jaloux, Nathalie Bini, Caroline Leclercq

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte JalouxMarseille University Hospital APHM, Institut de Neurophysiopathologie UMR 7051, Marseille, France.
Nathalie BiniCTO Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Caroline LeclercqInstitut de La Main, Clinique Bizet, 21 rue Georges Bizet, Paris, France. caroline.leclercq@free.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7927-9985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeformities of the spastic upper limb result frequently from the association of spasticity, muscle contracture and muscle imbalance between strong spastic muscles and weak non-spastic muscles. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of combining selective neurectomy of the usual spastic and strong muscles together with transfer of their motor nerves to the usual weak muscles, to improve wrist and fingers motion while decreasing spasticity.

methodsTwenty upper limbs from fresh frozen human cadavers were dissected. All motor branches of the radial and median nerve for the forearm muscles were identified. We attempted all possible end-to-end nerve transfers between the usually strong "donor" motor branches, namely FCR and PT, and the usually weak "recipient" motor branches (ERCL, ECRB, PIN, AIN).

resultsThe PT had two nerve branches in 80%, thus allowing selective neurectomy. The proximal PT branch could be anastomosed end-to-end in 45% (AIN) to 85% (ECRL) of cases with the potential recipient branches. The distal PT branch could be anastomosed end to end to all potential recipient nerves. The FCR had a single branch in all cases. End-to-end anastomosis was possible in 90% for the ECRL and in 100% for all other recipient branches, but sacrificed all FCR innervation, ruling out hyperselective neurectomy.

conclusionSelective neurectomies can be associated with distal nerve transfers at the forearm level in selected cases. The motor nerve to the PT is the best donor for nerve transfer combined with selective neurectomy, transferred to the ECRL, ECRB, PIN or AIN.

Indexed as

Nerve TransferCadaverForearmHumansMedian NerveMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityRadial NerveUpper ExtremityHyperselectiveNerve transfersSelective neurectomySpasticityUpper limb

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.