Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The abundance of bifidobacterium in relation to visceral obesity and serum uric acid.

Hualan Gong, Hainv Gao, Qingye Ren, Jia He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The Effects of a Prebiotic Formula PromotingInternational journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026
    Article
  12. The effect of short-term consumption ofExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hualan GongShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang, Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China. gonghl2008@163.com.
Hainv GaoShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang, Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Qingye RenShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang, Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Jia HeShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang, Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Shuren University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome has been shown to play a role in the development of obesity in recent studies. Most of these studies on obesity were based on the BMI classification criteria, which doesn't distinguish Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) from subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Some studies showed that VAT has a higher risk of inducing metabolic diseases than SAT. This study focused on the visceral obesity defined by increased visceral fat area. The present study was designed to investigate the association of visceral obesity with gut predominant microbiota and metabolic status. This study included 372 healthy individuals from medical examination center in Shulan Hangzhou Hospital. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) technique was used to detect ten kinds of gut predominant bacteria in fresh feces. Visceral fat area (VFA) was measured by the bioimpedance analyzer (INBODY720, Korea). The abundance of Bifidobacterium significantly decreased in the visceral obesity group. Compared with the lean group, Visceral obesity group had significantly higher levels of LDL, TG, FBG, serum uric acid (SUA) and lower levels of HDL. SUA was an independent impact factor for Bifidobacterium. SUA was negatively correlated with Bifidobacterium and positively correlated with VFA. In the mediation analysis, SUA showed significant mediation effect. SUA may be a mediating factor between decreased Bifidobacterium and increased VAT.

Indexed as

Obesity, AbdominalUric AcidBifidobacteriumHumansIntra-Abdominal FatObesitySubcutaneous FatUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID35906416
PMCPMC9338261
OpenAlexW4288701871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.