Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Dilatation of the bridging cerebral cortical veins in childhood hydrocephalus suggests a malfunction of venous impedance pumping.

Grant A Bateman, Alexander R Bateman, Gopinath M Subramanian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grant A BatemanDepartment of Medical Imaging, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Region Mail Center, Newcastle, NSW, 2310, Australia. grant.bateman@health.nsw.gov.au.
Alexander R BatemanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gopinath M SubramanianDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
John Hunter Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs with a naturally occurring form of hydrocephalus have an elevated transmural venous pressure leading to cortical vein dilatation. The purpose of this study is to discover if there is vein dilatation in childhood hydrocephalus and to estimate the pressure required to maintain any enlargement found. Children with hydrocephalus between the ages of 4 and 15 years were compared with a control group. Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and flow quantification were performed. The arterial inflow, sagittal sinus and straight sinus venous outflow were measured and the outflow percentages compared to the inflow were calculated. The cross-sectional area of the veins were measured. There were a total of 18 children with hydrocephalus, compared to 72 age and sex matched control MRV's and 22 control flow quantification studies. In hydrocephalus, the sagittal sinus venous return was reduced by 12.9%, but the straight sinus flow was not significantly different. The superficial territory veins were 22% larger than the controls but the vein of Galen was unchanged. There is evidence of a significant increase in the superficial vein transmural pressure in childhood hydrocephalus estimated to be approximately 4 mmHg. An impedance pump model is suggested to explain these findings.

Indexed as

Cerebral VeinsHydrocephalusAnimalsCranial SinusesDilatationDogsElectric ImpedanceMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35906407
PMCPMC9338310
OpenAlexW4288699668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.