Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2022
Effect of feeding with standard or higher-density formulas on anthropometric measures in children with congenital heart defects after corrective surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Breastfeeding infants with CHD: an evidence summary and recommendations from the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a special interest group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative.Cardiology in the young · 2025Guideline
- The Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guideline 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Challenges of managing anomalous mitral arcade with severe mitral regurgitation and hydrops fetalis in infants.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of feeding a higher-density formula (HDF) in infant with congenital heart disease (CHD).
methodsIn a parallel randomized trial, infants (6 to 12 months) who underwent CHD corrective surgery received either a standard-density formula (SDF, 67 kcal /100 ml) or an HDF (90 kcal/100 ml) after discharge from the intensive care unit for 8 weeks. In addition to the formula, infants could receive breast milk or complementary food. Anthropometry, biochemistry, and formula intake were collected.
resultSixty-four infants completed the study (n = 32 in each group). All infants gained weight. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of weight z score at baseline and week-8 were -2.38 ± 10.04 to -1.38 + 0.97 in the SDF group and -2.69 ± 1.19 to -0.89 ± 0.90 in the HDF group (between-group p = 0.0001). Both groups gained length, but showed a decline in length z-score which was significant in the SDF group but not significant in the HDF group. Mid-upper arm circumference and its z score improved in both groups, with more improvement in the HDF group. Serum albumin level was higher in the HDF than the SDF group at week-8, but no significant between-group differences were observed in hemoglobin, serum ferritin, or iron. Symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance were not reported, but parents of 4 infants in the HDF group complained of their infants' constipation.
conclusionFeeding infants using a concentrated formula could increase infants' weight gain and growth, and improve the nutritional status after CHD surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35906331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.