SynthesisPediatric research2024
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in perinatal arterial ischemic stroke: systematic review of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrovascular autoregulation and preterm brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2025Pooled it
- Stem cell-based interventions for the treatment of stroke in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Allogeneic Cell Therapy Applications in Neonates: A Systematic Review.Stem cells translational medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Neuroprotective Effects of Conditioned Medium of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC-CM) as a Therapy for Ischemic Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review.Neurochemical research · 2023Pooled it
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC)-based therapies for neonatal lung and brain injury - one size fits all?Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Review
- White matter injury after brain ischemia.Experimental neurology · 2026Review
- Review
- The Triad of Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity: Endothelial Cells, Astrocytes, and Pericytes in Perinatal Stroke Pathophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Brain Maturation as a Fundamental Factor in Immune-Neurovascular Interactions in Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2024Review
- Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Cell Therapy for Perinatal Brain Injury.Stem cells translational medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- ECI Biocommentary: Olga Romantsik.Pediatric research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is a neurologic disorder leading to long-term complications. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent. This systematic review aims to determine the effects of stem cell-based interventions for the treatment of PAIS in preclinical studies.
methodsWe included all controlled studies on MSCs in neonatal animals with PAIS. Functional outcome was the primary outcome. The literature search was performed in February 2021.
resultsIn the 20 included studies, MSCs were most frequently delivered via intracerebral injection (n = 9), 3 days after the induction of PAIS (n = 8), at a dose ranging from 5 × 10
conclusionMSCs appear to improve sensorimotor and cognitive performance in PAIS-injured animals; however, the certainty of the evidence is low. Registration of the protocol of preclinical studies, appropriate sample size calculation, rigorous randomization, and reporting of the data on animal sex and survival are warranted. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239642. IMPACT: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies investigating the effects of MSCs in an experimental model of PAIS. MSCs appear to improve sensorimotor and cognitive performance in PAIS-injured neonatal animals. The certainty of the evidence is low due to high or unclear risk of bias in most domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.