Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906306›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2023

Using machine learning to impact on long-term clinical care: principles, challenges, and practicalities.

James J Ashton, Aneurin Young, Mark J Johnson, R Mark Beattie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Hyperparameter optimization for cardiovascular disease data-driven prognostic system.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James J AshtonDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Aneurin YoungDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Mark J JohnsonDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
R Mark BeattieHuman Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Mark.beattie@uhs.nhs.uk.
University of Southampton · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBPrincess Anne Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of machine learning in healthcare has significant implications for paediatrics. Long-term conditions with significant disease heterogeneity comprise large portions of the routine work performed by paediatricians. Improving outcomes through discovery of disease and treatment prediction models, alongside novel subgroup clustering of patients, are some of the areas in which machine learning holds significant promise. While artificial intelligence has percolated into routine use in our day to day lives through advertising algorithms, song or movie selections and sifting of spam emails, the ability of machine learning to utilise highly complex and dimensional data has not yet reached its full potential in healthcare. In this review article, we discuss some of the foundations of machine learning, including some of the basic algorithms. We emphasise the importance of correct utilisation of machine learning, including adequate data preparation and external validation. Using nutrition in preterm infants and paediatric inflammatory bowel disease as examples, we discuss the evidence and potential utility of machine learning in paediatrics. Finally, we review some of the future applications, alongside challenges and ethical considerations related to application of artificial intelligence. IMPACT: Machine learning is a widely used term; however, understanding of the process and application to healthcare is lacking. This article uses clinical examples to explore complex machine learning terms and algorithms. We discuss limitations and potential future applications within paediatrics and neonatal medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedicineAlgorithmsChildHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35906306
PMCPMC9937918
OpenAlexW4288535519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.