ArticleScientific reports2022
Long-term changes in serum silver concentrations after extremity reconstruction with silver-coated megaprostheses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06887816 (Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic-Loaded Hydrogel, Calcium Bead, and Cement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip-Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially Available Products.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Potential side effects of antibacterial coatings in orthopaedic implants: A systematic review of clinical studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Pooled it
- A cohort study on inflammatory response and coagulation function changes in women with silver clip or silk ligation sterilisation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Metal ion exposure after oncologic megaprosthesis salvage surgery: a systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- First Clinical Evidence About the Use of a New Silver-Coated Titanium Alloy Instrumentation to Counteract Surgical Site Infection at the Spine Level.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Characteristics and Epidemiology of Megaprostheses Infections: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- What to Know about Antimicrobial Coatings in Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silver-coated megaprostheses are considered to reduce infection rate following reconstruction of bone defects in tumour surgery or revision arthroplasty. However, little is known about systemic silver exposure and possible side effects. The aim of this study was to analyse serum silver concentrations in patients with silver-coated megaprostheses over a prolonged time period. Between 2004 and 2016, 46 patients (52.2% female, mean age at surgery 47.1 ± 24.2 years) received silver-coated megaprostheses for septic (n = 26) or oncological (n = 17; main implant since 2013) indications, or aseptic loosening (n = 3). Blood was drawn from all patients within the first few days following surgery (without silver ion levels) and thereafter every 6 months at the outpatient department (with silver ion levels). Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to determine silver ion levels. Median follow-up was 47.3 months (IQR: 16.1-78.9). Overall, 29 revision surgeries became necessary in 20 patients, equivalent to a cumulative complication rate of 63.0%. Revisions were most commonly for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs, n = 12) and instability/soft tissue problems (n = 10). Revision-free implant survival was 81.4%, 42.3% and 35.2% at one, 5 and 10 years. Incidence of local argyria was 8.7% (n = 4). Silver ion levels at two or more consecutive time points during follow-up were available for 26 patients. An increment of silver levels within the first months ("run-in") was observed, followed by an unspecific undulating course. Median initial and latest follow-up (median, 49.5 months) serum silver ion levels were 16.0 ppb (IQR: 9.1-29.1) and 7.4 ppb (IQR: 2.7-14.1), respectively. According to the multivariate mixed linear random-effects model, development of PJI was associated with significantly higher silver ion levels over time (p = 0.002), irrespective of time from surgery (p = 0.274). In the current series, a cumulative complication rate of 63.0% was observed for patients receiving silver-coated megaprostheses for septic of oncological indications. An overall unspecific course of silver ion concentration was present. Development of PJI was significantly associated with increased silver ion levels over time. Yet, no systemic complication associated to high silver levels occurred. It can be concluded that silver-coated implants constitute a safe solution for megaprosthetic reconstruction, but monitoring of silver concentrations is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.