Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906231›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

Comparison of lactate/albumin ratio to lactate and lactate clearance for predicting outcomes in patients with septic shock admitted to intensive care unit: an observational study.

Kamran Shadvar, Nader Nader-Djalal, Noushin Vahed, Sarvin Sanaie, Afshin Iranpour, Ata Mahmoodpoor, Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Abbas Samim, Farshid Rahimi-Bashar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Prioritized factors of severity prognosis in patients admitted for sepsis or septic shock in a resource-limited region of central Vietnam.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kamran ShadvarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-9949
Nader Nader-DjalalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Buffalo University, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5744-7319
Noushin VahedFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sarvin SanaieNeurosciences Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2325-5631
Afshin IranpourAl-Zahra Private Hospital, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-0013-3992
Ata MahmoodpoorEvidence Based Research Center, General ICU, Shohada Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Gol Gasht Street, Tabriz, Iran. amahmoodpoor@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-6230
Amir Vahedian-AzimiTrauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1678-7608
Abbas SamimChemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-2674
Farshid Rahimi-BasharAnesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, AyatolahMotahari BLVD, Resalat Square, Hamadan, 6514845411, Iran. fr_rahimibashar@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-1425
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRHamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRJahra Hospital · KWUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Lactate to Albumin (L/A) ratio compared to that of lactate and lactate clearance in predicting outcomes in patients with septic shock. This was a multi-center observational study of adult patients with septic shock, who admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at Shohada and Imam Reza Hospitals, Tabriz, Iran, between Sept 2018 and Jan 2021. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore associations of the L/A ratio, lactate and lactate clearance on the primary (mortality) and secondary outcomes [ICU length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), need of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and duration of using vasopressors] at baseline, 6 h and 24 h of septic shock recognition. Best performing predictive value for mortality were related to lactate clearance at 24 h, L/A ratio at 6 h and lactate levels at 24 h with (AUC 0.963, 95% CI 0.918-0.987, P < 0.001), (AUC 0.917, 95% CI 0.861-0.956, P < 0.001), and (AUC 0.904, 95% CI 0.845-0.946, P < 0.001), respectively. Generally, the lactate clearance at 24 h had better prognostic performance for mortality and duration of using vasopressor. However, the L/A ratio had better prognostic performance than serum lactate and lactate clearance for RRT, ICU LOS and MV duration.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticAdultAlbuminsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLactic AcidPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAlbuminsLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35906231
PMCPMC9338032
OpenAlexW4288691441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.