Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906228›Full record

ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2022

Assessing clinical utility of preconception expanded carrier screening regarding residual risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

Paranchai Boonsawat, Anselm H C Horn, Katharina Steindl, Alessandra Baumer, Pascal Joset, Dennis Kraemer, Angela Bahr, Ivan Ivanovski, Elena M Cabello, Michael Papik and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Paranchai BoonsawatInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anselm H C HornInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-8103
Katharina SteindlInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alessandra BaumerInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pascal JosetMedical Genetics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dennis KraemerInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Angela BahrInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ivan IvanovskiInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elena M CabelloInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3006-3558
Michael PapikInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus ZweierInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beatrice OnedaInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pietro SirletoInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tilo BurkhardtUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-9973
Heinrich StichtInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Anita RauchInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. anita.rauch@medgen.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2930-3163

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 320030_179547Universität Zürich (University of Zurich) CRPP praeclare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude of clinical utility of preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS) concerning its potential to reduce the risk of affected offspring is unknown. Since neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in their offspring is a major concern of parents-to-be, we addressed the question of residual risk by assessing the risk-reduction potential for NDDs in a retrospective study investigating ECS with different criteria for gene selection and definition of pathogenicity. We used exome sequencing data from 700 parents of children with NDDs and blindly screened for carrier-alleles in up to 3046 recessive/X-linked genes. Depending on variant pathogenicity thresholds and gene content, NDD-risk-reduction potential was up to 43.5% in consanguineous, and 5.1% in nonconsanguineous couples. The risk-reduction-potential was compromised by underestimation of pathogenicity of missense variants (false-negative-rate 4.6%), inherited copy-number variants and compound heterozygosity of one inherited and one de novo variant (0.9% each). Adherence to the ACMG recommendations of restricting ECS to high-frequency genes in nonconsanguineous couples would more than halve the detectable inherited NDD-risk. Thus, for optimized clinical utility of ECS, screening in recessive/X-linked genes regardless of their frequency (ACMG Tier-4) and sensible pathogenicity thresholds should be considered for all couples seeking ECS.

Identifiers

PMID35906228
PMCPMC9338263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.