ArticleThoracic cancer2022
Sex differences in the characteristics and survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective analytical study based on real-world clinical data of the Korean population.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soluble immune checkpoints in lung cancer: linking prognostic signatures to immunotherapy response - a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Sexual dimorphism in cancer: molecular mechanisms and precision oncology perspectives.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- MAML-residual transformer for few-shot prediction of targeted therapy response in NSCLC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Association of Sex with Survival and Adverse Events in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Single-Center Experience in Türkiye.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Observational
- High Pretreatment DHEA Is Associated with Inferior Immunotherapy Response in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Sex differences in prognosis factors in patients with lung cancer: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea.PloS one · 2024Article
- Role ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Analysis of the clinical characteristics of pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Sex differences in the characteristics and survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective analytical study based on real-world clinical data of the Korean population.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the differences in characteristics, clinical stages, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on sex differences using Korean nationwide registry data.
methodsWe analyzed the data of 8650 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 2014 and 2017, obtained from the Korean Association for Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R). The Cox proportional hazard model was used to define the differences in survival based on sex. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between men and women.
resultsOf a total of 10 943 patients, 8650 (79.1%) were diagnosed with NSCLC, of whom 68.7% were men and 31.3% were women. For NSCLC, the median age was higher (69.0 vs. 67.0, p < 0.001) and the proportion of ever-smokers (84.5% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001) was higher in men. Adenocarcinoma (55.5% vs. 90.4%, p < 0.001) and stage I NSCLC (26.3% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001) were more common in women. Survival was significantly lower in men with NSCLC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.493 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.238-1.800], p < 0.001) even after adjusting for meaningful clinical variables, and in the matched cohort (HR 1.339 [1.075-1.667], p = 0.009). Similarly, survival was significantly lower in men with stage IV adenocarcinoma after adjusting for other clinical variables (HR 1.493 [1.238-1.800], p < 0.001) and in the matched cohort (HR 1.339 [1.075-1.667]; p = 0.009).
conclusionsMale patients with NSCLC had poorer prognosis, not only after variable adjustments for prognostic factors, but also in the matched cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.