Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906094›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2023

Static and Dynamic

Matthias Lang, Anna-Maria Spektor, Thomas Hielscher, Jorge Hoppner, Frederik M Glatting, Felix Bicu, Thilo Hackert, Ulrike Heger, Thomas Pausch, Ewgenija Gutjahr and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parametric mapping of dynamicCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Digital Biopsy and Network Analysis of Dynamic [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Image analysis:Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Utility ofMedComm · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prospective Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostic Potential of Supplemental Static and DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Immunohistochemical FAP Expression ReflectsJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias LangDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna-Maria SpektorDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HielscherDepartment of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jorge HoppnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik M GlattingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix BicuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrike HegerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas PauschDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ewgenija GutjahrDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hendrik RathkeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clemens KratochwilDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christine TjadenDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel RöhrichDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; manuel.roehrich@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may arise from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) with malignant transformation, but a significant portion of IPMN remains to show benign behavior. Therefore, it is important to differentiate between benign IPMN and IPMN lesions undergoing malignant transformation. However, nonoperative differentiation by ultrasound, CT, MRI, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is still unsatisfactory. Here, we assessed the clinical feasibility of additional assessment of malignancy by PET using

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic CystPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsGallium RadioisotopesHumansPancreasPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyGallium Radioisotopescancerdynamic PETFAPIfibroblast activation proteinIPMNPDACPET

Identifiers

PMID35906094
PMCPMC9902850
OpenAlexW4288690998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.