Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35906052›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Correlates of access to sanitation facilities and benefits received from the

Srayasi Prakash, Pradeep Kumar, Preeti Dhillon, Sayeed Unisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neighborhood Sanitation and Infant Mortality.American economic journal. Applied economics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Srayasi PrakashIndian Institute of Health Management Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Survey Research and Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India pradeepiips@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-820X
Preeti DhillonDepartment of Survey Research and Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9757-6492
Sayeed UnisaDepartment of Survey Research and Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEquitable and affordable access to improved sanitation facilities is linked to health and is among the priority areas of development programmes in a country like India. This study assesses the level of different sanitation facilities accessed by households and attempts to understand the socioeconomic characteristics of the households that received financial benefits from the

designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND

participantsThe study extracted data from the 76th round (2018) of the National Sample Survey, consisting of 106 837 households in India. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sanitation services and benefits received from the Swachh Bharat Mission in the last 3 years preceding the survey were the two outcome variables of this study. Bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with the outcome variables.

resultsFindings show the existence of state and regional disparities, along with rural-urban gaps, in the accessibility of sanitation facilities. Half of the households (52%, n=55 555) had access to safely managed sanitation facilities, followed by basic services (14.8%, n=15 812), limited services (11.4%, n=12 179) and unimproved services/open defecation (21.8%, n=23 290). Limited and unimproved facilities decreased significantly (p<0.001) with increase in economic status, although poor and less educated households received the maximum benefit from the Swachh Bharat Mission.

conclusionThe mission has been successful in increasing access overall; however, many people continue to lack access to improved sanitation and there remains a need to follow up poor and rural households to determine their usage of and the current state of their sanitation facilities.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSanitationCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsHumansIndiaSocioeconomic FactorsToilet Facilitiesimproved sanitation facilityIndiaopen defecationsafely managed sanitation servicesSwachh Bharat Mission

Identifiers

PMID35906052
PMCPMC9345042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.