ArticleSteroids2022
Progestogens exhibit progestogen-, promoter- and isoform-specific effects via the progesterone receptor.
Article in Steroids, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The transcriptional activity of progestins used in contraception and menopausal hormone therapy via progesterone receptor A is dependent on the density of the receptor.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are therapies designed to target the progesterone receptor (PR) to prevent unwanted pregnancy and to alleviate the symptoms of menopause, respectively, in women. Although these therapies are widely used globally, few studies have investigated in parallel how the transcriptional responses of the progestogens used in these therapies compare to each other via the PR isoforms (PR-A and PR-B). Using dose-response promoter-reporter and endogenous gene expression assays, we compared the transcriptional responses of six widely-used progestogens via each PR isoform. The present study shows that progestogens exhibit progestogen-specific potencies and efficacies via both PR isoforms. In addition, the endogenous gene expression data reveals that progestogens exhibit promoter-specific effects. Furthermore, this study reveals that progestogen responses via PR-A are significantly more potent and less efficacious than those observed via PR-B, and that this is unlikely due to differences in PR protein levels. Correlation analysis revealed that there is no detectable correlation between potency or efficacy of progestogens for PR-B or PR-A versus reported relative binding affinity (RBA) of progestogens for the PR, consistent with complex mechanisms of PR regulation. Taken together, our data show that it cannot be assumed that all progestogens have similar transcriptional responses on all genes. Since the PR plays a role in cognition, regulation of inflammation, mitochondrial function, neurogenesis, female reproduction and disease, the data suggest that these important physiological functions could be differentially affected depending on progestogen, promoter, and ratios of PR isoforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.