Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905451›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Augmentation of MS/MS Libraries with Spectral Interpolation for Improved Identification.

Ethan King, Richard Overstreet, Julia Nguyen, Danielle Ciesielski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ethan KingComputing and Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Richard OverstreetSignature Science and Technology Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Julia NguyenComputing and Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Danielle CiesielskiBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-4530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a primary tool for the identification of small molecules and metabolites where resultant spectra are most commonly identified by matching them with spectra in MS/MS reference libraries. The high degree of variability in MS/MS spectrum acquisition techniques and parameters creates a significant challenge for building standardized reference libraries. Here we present a method to improve the usefulness of existing MS/MS libraries by augmenting available experimental spectra data sets with statistically interpolated spectra at unreported collision energies. We find that highly accurate spectral approximations can be interpolated from as few as three experimental spectra and that the interpolated spectra will be consistent with true spectra gathered from the same instrument as the experimental spectra. Supplementing existing spectral databases with interpolated spectra yields consistent improvements to identification accuracy on a range of instruments and precursor types. Applying this method yields significant improvements (∼10% more spectra correctly identified) on large data sets (2000-10 000 spectra), indicating this is a quick yet adept tool for improving spectral matching in situations where available reference libraries are not yet sufficient. We also find improvements of matching spectra across instrument types (between an Agilent Q-TOF and an Orbitrap Elite), at high collision energies (50-90 eV), and with smaller data sets available through MassBank.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryDatabases, Factual

Identifiers

PMID35905451
PMCPMC9400100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.