Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905320›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Improving GWAS discovery and genomic prediction accuracy in biobank data.

Etienne J Orliac, Daniel Trejo Banos, Sven E Ojavee, Kristi Läll, Reedik Mägi, Peter M Visscher, Matthew R Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative omnigenic model discovers interpretable genome-wide associations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic association studies using disease liabilities from deep neural networks.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Etienne J OrliacScientific Computing and Research Support Unit, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel Trejo BanosDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Sven E OjaveeDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-7787
Kristi LällEstonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia.
Reedik MägiEstonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia.
Peter M VisscherInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Matthew R RobinsonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-8813

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically informed, deep-phenotyped biobanks are an important research resource and it is imperative that the most powerful, versatile, and efficient analysis approaches are used. Here, we apply our recently developed Bayesian grouped mixture of regressions model (GMRM) in the UK and Estonian Biobanks and obtain the highest genomic prediction accuracy reported to date across 21 heritable traits. When compared to other approaches, GMRM accuracy was greater than annotation prediction models run in the LDAK or LDPred-funct software by 15% (SE 7%) and 14% (SE 2%), respectively, and was 18% (SE 3%) greater than a baseline BayesR model without single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers grouped into minor allele frequency-linkage disequilibrium (MAF-LD) annotation categories. For height, the prediction accuracy

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyPrecision MedicineQuantitative Trait, HeritableBayes TheoremEnglandEstoniaGenomicsGenotypeHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotideassociation studyBayesian penalized regressiongenomic prediction

Identifiers

PMID35905320
PMCPMC9351350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.