Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905187›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Longer metaphase and fewer chromosome segregation errors in modern human than Neanderthal brain development.

Felipe Mora-Bermúdez, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak, Jula Peters, Ronald Naumann, Lei Xing, Mihail Sarov, Sylke Winkler, Christina Eugster Oegema, Christiane Haffner and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The activity and expression of adenylosuccinate lyase were reduced during modern human evolution, affecting brain and behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Double-checking chromosome segregation.The Journal of cell biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Felipe Mora-BermúdezMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3156-4370
Philipp KanisMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4705-4447
Dominik MacakMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Jula PetersMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0770-8891
Ronald NaumannMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Lei XingMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-4083
Mihail SarovMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2895-4087
Sylke WinklerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-3316
Christina Eugster OegemaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-0726
Christiane HaffnerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-675X
Pauline WimbergerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-577X
Stephan RiesenbergMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8171-1717
Tomislav MaricicMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3267-0474
Wieland B HuttnerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-7201
Svante PääboMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-6311
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPTechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the ancestors of modern humans separated from those of Neanderthals, around 100 amino acid substitutions spread to essentially all modern humans. The biological significance of these changes is largely unknown. Here, we examine all six such amino acid substitutions in three proteins known to have key roles in kinetochore function and chromosome segregation and to be highly expressed in the stem cells of the developing neocortex. When we introduce these modern human-specific substitutions in mice, three substitutions in two of these proteins, KIF18a and KNL1, cause metaphase prolongation and fewer chromosome segregation errors in apical progenitors of the developing neocortex. Conversely, the ancestral substitutions cause shorter metaphase length and more chromosome segregation errors in human brain organoids, similar to what we find in chimpanzee organoids. These results imply that the fidelity of chromosome segregation during neocortex development improved in modern humans after their divergence from Neanderthals.

Indexed as

HominidaeNeanderthalsAnimalsBrainChromosome SegregationHumansKinesinsMetaphaseMiceKIF18A protein, humanKinesins

Identifiers

PMID35905187
PMCPMC9337762
OpenAlexW4288693295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.