Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905125›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.

Meng-Yun Zhang, Peng Zhao, Yan Zhang, Ji-Shi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Perspective on oral medication adherence among patients with acute graft-versus-host disease: a qualitative descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng-Yun ZhangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, GuiZhou Province, China.
Peng ZhaoDepartment of Haematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, GuiZhou Province, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Haematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, GuiZhou Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8203-2094
Ji-Shi WangDepartment of Haematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, GuiZhou Province, China.
Guiyang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a cause of morbidity and mortality is treated with corticosteroids. However, patients with steroid-refractory GVHD after HSCT have a poor prognosis. Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor, is a novel treatment strategy for steroid-refractory GVHD.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib for the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD and analyse its adverse effects. STUDY

designMeta-analysis. SEARCH

methodsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of ruxolitinib-based therapy in patients with steroid-refractory GVHD were found in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science in March 2021. Outcomes included overall response rate, survival, and adverse effects. The Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS) and the Cochrane collaboration risk-of-bias tool were used to assess methodological quality. Funnel plots, Egger's test, and the trim and fill method were used to assess publication bias.

resultsIn total, 1470 studies were identified; 19 studies (17 non-RCTs, 2 RCTs) involving 1358 patients met our inclusion criteria. Survival rates at the longest follow-up in non-RCTs, were 57.5% (95% CI 46.9-67.4) and 80.3% (95% CI 69.7-87.9) for acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), respectively. In non-RCTs, the overall response was 74.9% (95% CI 66.6-81.8, I2 = 49%) in aGVHD and 73.1% (95% CI 62.5-81.6, I2 = 49%) in cGVHD. In aGVHD, the response rates were gastrointestinal, 61.4-90.2%; skin, 52.5-80.6%; and liver, 41.8-71.8%. In cGVHD, the response rates were gastrointestinal, 30.1-70.4%; skin, 30.1-84.4%; lung, 27.0-83.0%; and mouth 3.5-98.1%. In addition, a lower aGVHD grade and moderate cGVHD were associated with a better clinical response. Common adverse events were cytopenia and infectious complications.

conclusionsOur systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that ruxolitinib therapy could be a potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with steroid-refractory GVHD.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSteroidsNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibSteroids

Identifiers

PMID35905125
PMCPMC9337651
OpenAlexW4288708963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.