Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

COVID-19 pneumonia: Prediction of patient outcome by CT-based quantitative lung parenchyma analysis combined with laboratory parameters.

Thuy D Do, Stephan Skornitzke, Uta Merle, Maximilian Kittel, Stefan Hofbaur, Claudius Melzig, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Mark O Wielpütz, Oliver Weinheimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thuy D DoClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2561-3404
Stephan SkornitzkeClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uta MerleDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology and Infectious Disease), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian KittelInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2580-5038
Stefan HofbaurClinic for Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Landshut Hospital, Landshut, Germany.
Claudius MelzigClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mark O WielpützClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver WeinheimerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Landshut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the prognostic value of fully automatic lung quantification based on spectral computed tomography (CT) and laboratory parameters for combined outcome prediction in COVID-19 pneumonia.

methodsCT images of 53 hospitalized COVID-19 patients including virtual monochromatic reconstructions at 40-140keV were analyzed using a fully automated software system. Quantitative CT (QCT) parameters including mean and percentiles of lung density, fibrosis index (FIBI-700, defined as the percentage of segmented lung voxels ≥-700 HU), quantification of ground-glass opacities and well-aerated lung areas were analyzed. QCT parameters were correlated to laboratory and patient outcome parameters (hospitalization, days on intensive care unit, invasive and non-invasive ventilation).

resultsBest correlations were found for laboratory parameters LDH (r = 0.54), CRP (r = 0.49), Procalcitonin (r = 0.37) and partial pressure of oxygen (r = 0.35) with the QCT parameter 75th percentile of lung density. LDH, Procalcitonin, 75th percentile of lung density and FIBI-700 were the strongest independent predictors of patients' outcome in terms of days of invasive ventilation. The combination of LDH and Procalcitonin with either 75th percentile of lung density or FIBI-700 achieved a r2 of 0.84 and 1.0 as well as an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.99 and 1.0 for the prediction of the need of invasive ventilation.

conclusionsQCT parameters in combination with laboratory parameters could deliver a feasible prognostic tool for the prediction of invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLungProcalcitoninRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID35905122
PMCPMC9337660
OpenAlexW4288696142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.