Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35905045›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Characteristics, challenges and innovations of waste picker organizations: A comparative perspective between Latin American and East African countries.

Jaan-Henrik Kain, Patrik Zapata, Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo, Sebastián Carenzo, Goodluck Charles, Jutta Gutberlet, Michael Oloko, Jessica Pérez Reynosa, María José Zapata Campos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Deposit pickers in the Nordic: The role of deposit-refund systems for waste pickers in Stockholm.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaan-Henrik KainGothenburg Research Institute GRI, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8838-099X
Patrik ZapataSchool of Public Administration, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7029-1195
Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de AzevedoCentro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André -SP, Brazil.
Sebastián CarenzoCONICET and Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Goodluck CharlesUniversity of Dar es Salaam Business School, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jutta GutberletDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-1483
Michael OlokoSchool of Engineering and Technology, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo, Kenya.
Jessica Pérez ReynosaInstituto Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Centroamerica (UCA), Managua, Nicaragua.
María José Zapata CamposSchool Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste picker organisations (WPOs) around the globe collect, transport and process waste to earn their living but represent a widely excluded, marginalised and impoverished segment of society. WPOs are highly innovative, created by grassroots out of "nothing" to deliver economic, social and environmental sustainability. Still, we do not know how such innovations are developed, and how they are disseminated and adopted by other groups. This article examines characteristics, challenges and innovations of WPOs across five countries in Latin America and East Africa. It is based on quantitative and qualitative data regarding modes of organisation and management, gender, received support, business orientations, environmental and social contributions, and innovations developed in response to multiple challenges. The paper provides a comprehensive understanding of WPOs' activities and their grassroots innovations in the Global South. The study shows how WPOs contribute significantly to the economic, social and environmental sustainability of the societies they serve as well as the wider urban societies. To start and maintain WPOs in informal settlements with a lack of infrastructure, institutional frameworks, and public and private investors is a difficult quest. WPOs take many different organisational forms depending on the complexity of local realities, ranging from advanced collective organization as cooperatives to small self-help groups and microentrepreneurs. Self-organisation into regional and national networks provides economic opportunities, autonomy and stability as well as political influence. Yet, institutional support is fundamental and the lack thereof threatens their existence. Sustaining WPOs as important providers of socio-environmental benefits through governmental and non-governmental actions is a worthwhile undertaking that builds sustainability.

Indexed as

RecyclingRefuse DisposalAfrica, EasternIncomeLatin AmericaOrganizations

Identifiers

PMID35905045
PMCPMC9337677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.