ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2023
Efficacy of Omadacycline or Vancomycin Combined With Germinants for Preventing Clostridioides difficile Relapse in a Murine Model.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics: Characteristics, Contributing Factors, and Clinical Significance.Drugs in R&D · 2025Review
- Third-Generation Tetracyclines: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Potential.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClostridioides difficile infections (CDI) and recurrence (rCDI) are major health care burdens. Recurrence is likely caused by spores in the gastrointestinal tract that germinate after antibiotic therapy. This murine study explores germinant-antibiotic combinations for CDI.
methodsPreviously described murine models were evaluated using C. difficile VPI 10463. The severe model compared omadacycline versus vancomycin in survival, weight loss, clinical scoring, and C. difficile toxin production. The nonsevere model compared these antibiotics with and without germinants (solution of sodium taurocholate, taurine, sodium docusate, calcium gluconate). Additionally, colon histopathology, bile acid analysis, environmental/spore shedding, and 16S sequencing was evaluated.
resultsIn the severe model, omadacycline-treated mice had 60% survival versus 13.3% with vancomycin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.327; 95% confidence interval [CI],.126-.848; P = .015) along with decreased weight loss, and disease severity. In the nonsevere model, all mice survived with antibiotic-germinant treatment versus 60% antibiotics alone (HR, 0.109; 95% CI, .02-.410; P = .001). Omadacycline resulted in less changes in bile acids and microbiota composition. Germinant-treated mice showed no signs of rCDI, spore shedding, or significant toxin production at 15 days.
conclusionsIn murine models of CDI, omadacycline improved survival versus vancomycin. Germinant-antibiotic combinations were more effective at preventing rCDI compared to antibiotics alone without inducing toxin production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.