Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904729›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2022

Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies.

Natalie Strand, Maloney J, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Murphy M, Michal Turkiewicz, Antonios El Helou, Maita M, Covington S, Singh N, Peck J and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence and pain medicine education: Benefits and pitfalls for the medical trainee.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalie StrandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. strand.natalie@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-2550
Maloney JDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Murphy MDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Michal TurkiewiczMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Antonios El HelouDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB, Canada.
Maita MDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Covington SDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Singh NOrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Peck JPerforming Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA.
Wie CDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review highlights the interventional musculoskeletal techniques that have evolved in recent years. RECENT

findingsThe recent progress in pain medicine technologies presented here represents the ideal treatment of the pain patient which is to provide personalized care. Advances in pain physiology research and pain management technologies support each other concurrently. As new technologies give rise to new perspectives and understanding of pain, new research inspires the development of new technologies.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsPain ManagementHumansPainAnalgesicsChronic painNeuromodulationPain medicineSI o

Identifiers

PMID35904729
PMCPMC9334973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.