Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024
Evaluating sensitive symptoms in young adult cancer survivors: acceptability of suicidal ideation and sexual health items across administration modes.
Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for assessing potential late effects experienced by young adult cancer survivors (YACS), but stigma and social desirability bias may limit their effectiveness for assessing sensitive topics (e.g., suicidal ideation, sexual health). This study compared two methods of item administration to determine the optimal method for obtaining sensitive information in YACS.
methodsTwo hundred forty-four YACS (ages 18-40) were randomized to complete measures of suicidal ideation and sexual health (i.e., sensitive items) by paper survey or by telephone automated computer assisted structured interview (TACASI). Participants also provided information on acceptability of administration mode and sensitive items.
resultsThe proportion of participants reporting symptoms did not significantly vary between paper and TACASI administration: respectively, 10% vs. 12% reported suicidal ideation and 55% vs. 58% reported sexual health concerns. The majority (≥ 78%) of participants reported feeling comfortable answering sensitive items on paper and TACASI and there were no significant differences in acceptability based on administration mode. Although participants endorsing sensitive symptoms were significantly more likely to feel upset answering sensitive items, the majority (93%) of participants experiencing symptoms still felt they were important to ask.
conclusionsDespite their potentially sensitive nature, questions about suicidal ideation and sexual health were highly acceptable to YACS across administration modes. Moreover, YACS almost universally endorse the importance of providers asking about these topics. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings should bolster provider confidence that screening for suicidal ideation and sexual health concerns can and should be integrated into clinical care for YACS using paper or technology-assisted methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.