Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904698›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2022

Physical Training Protects Against Brain Toxicity in Mice Exposed to an Experimental Model of Glioblastoma.

Amanda K Costa, Luis F B Marqueze, Bruna B Gattiboni, Giulia S Pedroso, Franciane F Vasconcellos, Eduardo B B Cunha, Hanna C Justa, Antonielle B Baldissera, Seigo Nagashima, Lucia de Noronha and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda K CostaGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Luis F B MarquezeGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Bruna B GattiboniGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Giulia S PedrosoGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Franciane F VasconcellosGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Eduardo B B CunhaGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Hanna C JustaDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Antonielle B BaldisseraDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Seigo NagashimaGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Lucia de NoronhaGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil.
Zsolt RadakResearch Institute of Sport Science, University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary.
Luiz C FernandesResearch Institute of Sport Science, University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary.
Ricardo A PinhoGraduate Program in Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Tech Park - Block 4, Laboratory 3. Imaculada Conceição Street, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PE, 80215-901, Brazil. rapinho12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-4553
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRHungarian University of Sports Science · HUUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 307669/2019-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma 261 (Gl261) cell-mediated neurotoxicity has been reported in previous studies examining glioblastoma (GBM), and the effects of physical exercise (PE) on this neurotoxicity have been poorly investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a PE program in animals with experimental GBM. Male C57BL/6J mice were randomized into sham or GBM groups and subjected to a PE program for four weeks. Gl261 cells were administered into the intraventricular region at 48 h after the last exercise session. Body weight, water and feed consumption, and behavior were all evaluated for 21 days followed by euthanasia. The right parietal lobe was removed for the analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vimentin, C-myc, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), hydrogen peroxide, the glutathione system, and oxidative damage to proteins. The results revealed changes in the behavioral patterns of the trained animals, and no anatomopathological changes were observed in response to PE training. In contrast, animals with GBM subjected to PE exhibited lower immunoexpression of c-MYC, vimentin, and GFAP. Although experimental GBM altered the redox profile and inflammatory mediators, no significant alterations were observed after PE. In conclusion, our data provide consistent evidence of the relationship between PE and the improvement of tumorigenic parameters against the neurotoxicity of GL261 cells.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaGliomaAnimalsBrainErbB ReceptorsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGlutathioneHydrogen PeroxideInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6MaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, TheoreticalNF-kappa BErbB ReceptorsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGlutathioneHydrogen PeroxideInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6NF-kappa BTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVimentinWaterBrain tumorGlioblastomaInflammationOxidative stressPhysical exercise

Identifiers

PMID35904698
OpenAlexW4288535410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.