ArticleAnimal cognition2022
Plasticity for the kin and conspecific preferences in the frog tadpoles (Rana ornativentris).
Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social isolation, rather than kinship, influences association behavior in toad tadpoles (Bufo formosus).Animal cognition · 2026Article
- Grouping rule in tadpole: is quantity more or size assortment more important?Animal cognition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vertebrates, little is known of kin recognition systems and their plasticity. Even in well-studied anuran larvae (tadpoles), the determinants and effects of prior experience have not been clarified. This study evaluates the plasticity of kin and conspecific discrimination in tadpoles of the Japanese montane brown frog Rana ornativentris. We raised tadpoles under two different sibship conditions: the pure line, comprising only siblings, and the mixed line, comprising both siblings and non-siblings. The association preference by a subject tadpole to unfamiliar ("stimulus") tadpoles was assessed through binary-choice tests using a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design among each kinship line (pure and mix), subject ontogeny/size (early stage/small and late-stage/large), and stimuli ontogeny/size. Contrary to our expectations, kin preference was confirmed only in early developmental small tadpoles from mixed line, and only with a small stimulus. Furthermore, tadpoles from mixed line did not exhibit size preference for unrelated conspecifics. These results suggest that different prior associations have modulated kin templates along tadpole ontogeny and that the presence of non-kin would enhance the learning of kin/non-kin. This study provides the first example that plasticity of kin recognition affects not only kin-biased association but also conspecific recognition along ontogeny in tadpoles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.